Skip to content
3 months free on your first order until October 31, 2026 Get it now
ArticlesSustainable fuels

Hydrogen, electric, biofuel: which energy for heavy transport right now

Electric, hydrogen, biofuels: each energy source has its strengths, but not all are ready today for heavy freight. A no-nonsense comparison to help transport directors pick the most realistic option.

H
Heeding
· 2 min read
Hydrogen, electric, biofuel: which energy for heavy transport right now

Electric: unbeatable in town, still limited on the road

The battery electric truck (BEV) is a natural fit for urban rounds and last-mile delivery. Quiet operation, no local emissions, lower maintenance costs: on short, predictable routes the equation already works for many fleets.

On long-haul routes, the picture shifts. Battery weight eats into payload, range remains limited, and the fast-charging network suited to heavy trucks is still in its infancy on major European corridors.

  • Pros: lower running costs, quiet operation, ideal for urban logistics
  • Pros: growing technological maturity on short and medium-range models
  • Cons: range and charging times incompatible with long-haul operations
  • Cons: heavy-duty charging infrastructure almost nonexistent on highways
  • Cons: battery weight reduces usable payload

Hydrogen: a credible promise, not yet an operational solution

On paper, hydrogen ticks every box: zero tailpipe emissions, diesel-like range, short refuelling times. It is a technology Heeding follows closely, since it structurally addresses the constraints of heavy freight.

But for a transport director today, the promise remains largely theoretical. Vehicle and station acquisition costs are high, and the distribution network is almost nonexistent outside a handful of pilot corridors.

  • Pros: range and refuelling time comparable to diesel
  • Pros: zero local emissions, strong long-term potential
  • Cons: high investment cost (vehicles, stations)
  • Cons: distribution network almost nonexistent in Europe

Biofuel: the only decarbonisation option available right now

HVO (hydrotreated vegetable oil) is a drop-in fuel: it replaces diesel with no engine modification and no change to refuelling logistics. It is the only solution that decarbonises an existing fleet without waiting for vehicle turnover.

  • Pros: immediately compatible with existing diesel trucks
  • Pros: significant, traceable and documented GHG reduction
  • Pros: growing availability through existing distribution networks
  • Cons: dependent on feedstock availability and cost
  • Cons: does not remove the need for a longer-term shift to electric or hydrogen

Choose the right energy, not the trendiest one

There is no single right answer, only a hierarchy of maturity. Electric works for short rounds, hydrogen remains a future path to prepare for, and biofuel is the only lever that can be activated immediately across an entire long-haul fleet.

A pragmatic transport director combines these energies according to use case, rather than betting on a single technology. The priority remains securing measurable emission reductions without waiting for infrastructure to fully mature.

Before investing in tomorrow's technology, assess your fleet's real performance with a solution available today. A Heeding Flash Assessment provides a concrete evaluation of HVO's potential for your operations.

Related articles

Your Thoughts

We'd love to hear your thoughts

Heeding

Weekly newsletter

No spam. Just the latest releases and insights, plus exclusive interviews in your inbox every week.

Read about our privacy policy.

We use cookies and similar technologies for analytics and functionality. See our Cookie Policy.